From Vision to Delivery: Rethinking Strategy Execution in the UK Public Sector
- Özge İskit

- Aug 28
- 2 min read

With the Spending Review 2025 published, the UK government has laid out a roadmap that emphasizes resilience, reform, and regeneration. The ambition is clear but ambition is not execution. Translating strategy into meaningful change demands more than a well-articulated policy.
Through the large-scale programmes with over £5bn positive impact that I delivered across UK government departments, local authorities, the EU, and the UN in the past two decades I’ve seen firsthand how strategy and change must be shaped by outcome-led delivery and agile governance. As the UK embarks on a new chapter of public sector reform, strategic insight must be grounded in operational reality.
What must shift in the delivery architecture to make these ambitions real?
1) Governance integration: Policy silos remain a barrier to coordinated delivery. Cross-departmental PMOs and agile governance models must become standard operating tools, not exceptions.
2) Stakeholder intelligence: Engagement isn't just communication. It’s about understanding ecosystem dynamics and shifting incentives.
3) Outcome-based investment frameworks: Whether through the National Housing Bank or Net Zero initiatives, investment must be tied to measurable outcomes. Aligning capital with policy intent requires rigor, iteration, and a feedback loop rooted in evidence.
4) Place-led capacity building: Strategy is increasingly local. Councils and regional bodies must be equipped not just with funding but with tools, training, and autonomy. Capacity-building models must be adapted, not copied.
5) Delivery discipline: RAID logs, change control protocols, and impact assessments may seem procedural but they are essential for adjusting course. Without disciplined execution frameworks, reform becomes rhetoric.
Strategic delivery is not a technical function. It's a leadership function. As the UK seeks to translate its priorities into results, the conversation must shift toward operational realism and adaptive governance.


Comments